AAC Accepts, published online ahead of print on 2 November 2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McGhee, P.
Right arrow Articles by Appelbaum, P. C.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McGhee, P.
Right arrow Articles by Appelbaum, P. C.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. doi:10.1128/AAC.01123-09
Copyright (c) 2009, American Society for Microbiology and/or the Listed Authors/Institutions. All Rights Reserved.

IN VITRO ACTIVITY OF CEM-101 AGAINST STREPTOCOCCUS PNEUMONIAE AND STREPTOCOCCUS PYOGENES WITH DEFINED MACROLIDE RESISTANCE MECHANISMS

Pamela McGhee, Catherine Clark, Klaudia Kosowska-Shick, Kensuke Nagai, Bonifacio Dewasse, Linda Beachel, and Peter C. Appelbaum*

Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA 17033; and Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: pappelbaum{at}psu.edu.


arrow
Abstract

CEM-101 had an MIC range against macrolide-susceptible pneumococci of 0.002-0.016 μg/ml and of 0.004-1 μg/ml against macrolide-resistant phenotypes. Only 3 strains with erm(B) ± mef(A) had CEM-101 MICs of 1 μg/ml and 218/221 strains had CEM-101 MICs ≤0.5 μg/ml. CEM-101 MICs were up to 4-fold lower than those of telithromycin against all strains. Against Streptococcus pyogenes, CEM-101 MICs ranged between 0.008-0.03 μg/ml against macrolide-susceptible, and 0.015-1 μg/ml against -resistant strains. Against erm(B) strains, erythromycin, azithromycin, clarithromycin MICs were 32->64 μg/ml while 17/19 strains had telithromycin MICs of 4 -16 μg/ml; CEM-101 MICs were 0.015-1 μg/ml. By comparison, erm(A) and mef(A) strains had CEM-101 MICs of 0.015-0.5 μg/ml, clindamycin and telithromycin MICs ≤1 μg/ml, with erythromycin, azithromycin and clarithromycin MICs of 0.5->64 μg/ml. Pneumococcal multistep resistance studies showed that although CEM-101 yielded clones with higher MICs in all 8 strains tested, 7 of 8 strains had clones with CEM-101 MICs which rose from 0.004-0.03 μg/ml (parents) to 0.06-0.5 μg/ml (resistant clones); in only 1 erm(B) + mef(A) strain with a parental MIC of 1 μg/ml was there a resistant clone with an MIC of 32 μg/ml with no detectable mutations in L4, L22, or 23S rRNA sequences. Among 2 of 5 S. pyogenes strains tested, CEM-101 MICs rose from 0.03– 0.25 μg/ml, and only in the 1 strain with erm(B) did CEM-101 MICs rise from 1 to 8 μg/ml with no changes occurring in any macrolide resistance determinant. CEM-101 had low MICs as well as low potential for selection of resistant mutants independent of bacterial species or resistance phenotypes in pneumococci and S.pyogenes.